4.7 Article

Gas sensing characteristics of Fe-doped tungsten oxide thin films

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 345-353

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.04.032

Keywords

Tungsten oxide; Iron doping; Nanostructured thin films; NO2 gas sensing

Funding

  1. Queensland Government Smart Futures Fund - National and International Research Alliances Program (NIRAP)
  2. Japanese Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the gas sensing characteristics of Fe-doped (10 at.%) tungsten oxide thin films of various thicknesses (100-500 nm) prepared by electron beam evaporation. The performance of these flims in sensing four gases (H-2, NH3, NO2 and N2O) in the concentration range 2-10,000 ppm at operating temperatures of 150-280 degrees C has been investigated. The results are compared with the sensing performance of a pure WO3 film of thickness 300 nm produced by the same method. Doping of the tungsten oxide film with 10 at.% Fe significantly increases the base conductance of the pure film but decreases the gas sensing response. The maximum response measured in this experiment, represented by the relative change in resistance when exposed to a gas, was Delta R/R=375. This was the response amplitude measured in the presence of 5 ppm NO2 at an operating temperature of 250 degrees C using a 400 nm thick WO3 :Fe film. This value is slightly lower than the corresponding result obtained using the pure WO3 film (Delta R/R = 450). However it was noted that the WO3:Fe sensor is highly selective to NO2. exhibiting a much higher response to NO2 compared to the other gases. The high performance of the sensors to NO2 was attributed to the small grain size and high porosity of the films, which was obtained through e-beam evaporation and post-deposition heat treatment of the films at 300 degrees C for 1 h in air. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available