4.7 Article

Hydrogel based sensor arrays (2 x 2) with perforated piezoresistive diaphragms for metabolic monitoring (in vitro)

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages 807-816

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.01.063

Keywords

Chemical sensor; Pressure sensor; Piezoresistive; Hydrogel; Array

Funding

  1. NIH [5R21EB008571-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report details the first experimental results from novel hydrogel sensor array (2 x 2) which incorporates analyte diffusion pores into a piezoresistive diaphragm for the detection of hydrogel swelling pressures and hence chemical concentrations. The sensor assembly was comprised of three components, the active four sensors, HPMA/DMA/TEGDMA (hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMA) and crosslinker tetra-ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA)) hydrogel, and backing plate. Each of the individual sensors of the array can be used with various hydrogels used to measure the presence of a number of stimuli including pH, ionic strength, and glucose concentrations. Ideally, in the future, these sensors will be used for continuous metabolic monitoring applications and implanted subcutaneously. In this paper and to properly characterize the sensor assembly, hydrogels sensitive to changes ionic strength were synthesized using hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMA) and crosslinker tetra-ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and inserted into the sensor assembly. This hydrogel quickly and reversibly swells when placed environments of physiological buffer solutions (PBS) with ionic strengths ranging from 0.025 to 0.15 M, making it ideal for proof-of-concept testing and initial characterization. The assembly was wire bonded to a printed circuit board and coated with 3 +/- 0.5 mu m of Parylene-C using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to protect the sensor and electrical connections during ionic strength wet testing. Two versions of sensors were fabricated for comparison, the first incorporated diffusion pores into the diaphragm, and the second used a solid diaphragm with perforated backing plate. This new design (perforated diaphragm) was shown to have slightly higher sensitivity than solid diaphragm sensors with separate diffuse backing plates when coupled with the hydrogel. The sensitivities for the 1 mm x 1 mm, 1.25 mm x 1.25 mm, 1.5 mm x 1.5 mm perforated diaphragm sensors were 53.3 +/- 6.5, 171.7 +/- 8.8, and 271.47 +/- 27.53 mV/V-M, respectively. These results show that perforations in the diaphragm can be used not only to allow the diffusion of analyte into the cavity but to increase mechanical stress in the piezoresistive diaphragm, thereby increasing sensor output signal. The time constants for swelling (tau(swelling)) and contracting (tau(contracting)) were calculated by fitting the sensor output half cycles to an exponential growth function. We found that the sensors' response was initially retarded during the preliminary hydrogel conditioning period then improved after 3-5 cycles with values of approximately 9 and 7 min for tau(swelling) and tau(contracting). For all sensors tested tau(swelling) > tau(contracting). This may be due to the increased loading on the hydrogel from the diaphragm during the swelling process. During contraction the diaphragm aids the hydrogel by reversibly applying mechanical pressure and therefore reducing tau(contracting). Long term stability testing showed the sensors remained functional for upwards of 2 weeks in the test phosphate buffer solution (PBS). (C) 2010 Elsevier BM. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available