4.7 Article

High fidelity hot-embossing of COC microdevices using a one-step process without pre-annealing of polymer substrate

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 150, Issue 2, Pages 692-699

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.08.018

Keywords

Polymer microfabrication; COC; Hot embossing; High fidelity; Microchannels; Polymer chain orientation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of a one-step process for producing high fidelity hot-embossed cyclic-olefin co-polymer (COC) based microfluidic devices without the need for pre-annealing the base polymer substrate/film is outlined This was achieved through proper selection of the hot-embossing conditions that was based on an in-depth understanding of the fundamental factors which affect the replication accuracy of microchannels during the hot-embossing process An important factor that is commonly overlooked in the hot-embossing of films (typically with thicknesses less than 1 mm) is the existence of polymer chain orientation Generally polymer films used for hot-embossing are not pre-annealed to minimize residual stresses and remove any chain orientation that may be present and this affects the replication accuracy In contrast polymer substrates (typically with thicknesses more than 1 mm) that are used for hot-embossing to produce microfluidic devices need to be pre-annealed to minimize residual stresses and remove any chain orientation Processing of the latter thus required an additional step The avoidance of such pre-annealing may affect the replication accuracy In the present work it was demonstrated that microfluidic devices with high fidelity microchannels could be produced using a single-step hot-embossing process based on knowledge of the influence of embossing temperature embossing pressure embossing time and polymer chain orientation in the film/substrate on micro-replication (c) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available