4.7 Article

Electrochemical glucose sensor based on one-step construction of gold nanoparticle-chitosan composite film

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages 539-544

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.048

Keywords

Nanoparticles; Electrochemical sensor; Glucose determination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple and controllable electrodeposition method for the preparation of a chitosan-gold it nanoparticles (GNPs) nanocomposite sensing film on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) Surface was proposed and further used for the construction of all glucose non-enzymatic sensor. This novel interface embedded in situ GNPs in chitosan hydrogel was constructed by one-step electrochemical deposition in solution containing tetrachloroauric (III) acid (HAuCl4) and chitosan. This deposited interface possessed excellent stability by the characterization of cyclic voltammetry and Pulse voltammetry in phosphate buffer (pH 7.10). The application in serum analysis as a possible alternative for electrochemical detection of glucose has been investigated. Several key operational parameters affecting the electrochemical response of nanostructured sensing film were examined and optimized, such as deposition conditions, scan rate, electrolyte and its pH Values. As the nanostructured sensing film provides plenty of active sites for the direct oxidation of glucose, the glucose sensor exhibited excellent performance including wide linearity, simple operation and good stability at the optimized conditions. The glucose sensor exhibited good linear behavior in the concentration range from 4.00 x 10(-4) mol/L to 1.07 x 10(-2) mol/L for the quantitative analysis of glucose with a limit of detection of 3.70 x 10(-4) mol/L. Finally, it has been demonstrated that this sensor call be well Used for (lie assay of glucose in rat serum samples. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available