4.7 Article

Highly selective determination of uric acid in the presence of ascorbic acid at glassy carbon electrodes modified with carbon nanotubes dispersed in polylysine

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages 559-565

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.05.035

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Glassy carbon; Catalysis; Polylysine; Carbon nanotubes dispersion; Uric acid; Ascorbic acid; Electrochemical sensor

Funding

  1. Fundacion Antorchas
  2. CONICET
  3. SECyT-UNC
  4. ANPCyT
  5. Programa de Becas Banco Santander-Rio y Banco Santander-UAM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports the highly selective and sensitive uric acid quantification in the presence of ascorbic acid using glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) modified with multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) dispersed in polylysine (Plys) (GCE/MWCNT-Plys). The electrocatalytic activity of MWCNT deposited on GCEs has allowed an important decrease in the overvoltages for ascorbic acid oxidation (440 mV), making possible the clear definition of the oxidation processes of ascorbic acid and uric acid. Two protocols for uric acid quantification are described, the direct differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) detection, and the DPV-adsorptive stripping detection with medium exchange. For the direct determination of uric acid, the sensitivities were (9.8 +/- 0.2) x 10(4) mu AM(-1) (r=0.994), and (10.7 +/- 0.2) x 10(4) mu A M-1 (r=0.994) in the presence and absence of 1.0 mM ascorbic acid, respectively. The detection limit for uric acid in the mixture was 17 mu M. In the case of DPV-adsorptive stripping determination, an important enhancement in sensitivity was obtained, allowing the detection of 2.2 mu M uric acid in a mixture containing 1.0 mM ascorbic acid. The sensor was successfully used for the quantification of uric acid in serum samples. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available