4.7 Article

Energy harvesting performance of piezoelectric electrospun polymer fibers and polymer/ceramic composites

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages 55-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2013.03.023

Keywords

Energy harvesting; Piezoelectric polymers; Polymer composites; Electrospinning

Funding

  1. FEDER funds through the Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade - COMPETE
  2. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [NANO/NMed-SD/0156/2007, PTDC/CTM/73030/2006, PTDC/CTM/69316/2006, PEST-C/FIS/UI607/2011]
  3. COST Action 'European Scientific Network for Artificial Muscles' [MP1003]
  4. FCT [SFRH/BD/66930/2009, SFRH/BPD/63148/2009, SFRH/BD/48708/2008]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/CTM/73030/2006, SFRH/BD/48708/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The energy harvesting efficiency of electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride), its copolymer vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene and composites of the later with barium titanate ceramic fillers on interdigitated electrodes has been investigated. Ceramic fillers of 500 (tetragonal), 100 (cubic) and 10 nm (cubic) have been used. Further, a study of the influence of the electrospinning processing parameters on the average size of the composites fibers has been performed. It is found that the best energy harvesting performance was obtained for pure poly(vinylidene fluoride) fibers, with power outputs up to 0.02 mu W and 25 mu W under low and high mechanical deformation. The copolymer and the composites show reduced power output mainly due to increased mechanical stiffness, the power output of the composites being better for the nonpiezoelectic smaller fillers. The obtained values, among the largest found in the literature, the easy processing and the low cost and robustness of the polymer, demonstrate the applicability of the developed system. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available