4.3 Review

The primary hyperoxalurias

Journal

SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 152-162

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2008.01.008

Keywords

alanine : glyoxylate aminotransferase; glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase; hyperoxaluria; kidney stones; peroxisomal disorders; probiotics; pyridoxine; systemic oxalosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary hyperoxalurias (PHs) are rare autosomal-recessive inborn errors of metabolism. In the most severe form (type 1), recurrent kidney stones and progressive nephrocalcinosis lead to the loss of kidney function, accompanied by systemic oxalosis, and often requires dialysis and/or transplantation. The variety of genetic mutations leading to PH increasingly are being defined, resulting in the ability to diagnose most patients accurately via minimally invasive means. During and after definitive diagnosis, supportive therapies with pyridoxine supplementation, urinary crystallization inhibitors, and hydration should be used, but have varying success. Emerging information about the renal tubular and intestinal transport of oxalate is leading to increasing evidence to support the use of oxalate-degrading bacteria (probiotics) and enzymes in the treatment of PH. Organ transplantation historically has offered the only potential cure for PH, and may include kidney-alone, combined liver-kidney, or pre-emptive liver-alone transplantation. Exciting new approaches in the treatment of type 1PH, however, are under investigation. These include the restoration of defective enzymatic activity through the use of chemical chaperones, hepatocyte cell transplantation, or enzyme replacement by recombinant gene therapy. These novel approaches illustrate the goal for the ideal treatment of PH: correcting the genetic defect without exposing patients to the life-long risks associated with organ transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available