4.2 Review

Rare chromosomal, genetic, and epigenetic-related risks associated with infertility treatment

Journal

SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 250-253

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2014.04.005

Keywords

IVF; ART; Chromosome anomalies; Cystic fibrosis; Genomic imprinting; Health outcomes; Imprinting disorders; Microdeletions

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the rarer chromosomal, genetic, and epigenetic-related risks of adverse child outcomes associated with infertility and its treatment. Excess structural chromosomal anomalies have been found in both male and female partners undergoing infertility treatment, and these risk direct transmission to offspring. Microdeletions of the Y-chromosome associated with male infertility have been transmitted to sons following treatment with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. It is thus possible that male offspring of men with infertility could experience fertility problems in adulthood. Infertility treatment for men with cystic fibrosis, or with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens in the absence of cystic fibrosis, who have azoospermia is now possible using surgically retrieved sperm. Transmission of known cystic fibrosis mutations can be avoided by testing the female partner prior to treatment and offering pre-implantation genetic diagnosis if she is a carrier. The effect of infertility and its treatment on genomic imprinting is of increasing concern as our understanding of the mechanisms of imprinting in germ cell development and embryogenesis expands. At present, it is far from clear whether there are longstanding effects of infertility per se or of its treatment on the health of adults who were conceived following assisted reproductive technologies, but available data suggest that this should be of concern and long-term follow-up studies are required. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available