3.9 Article

Multiphoton Laser Scanning Microscopy-A Novel Diagnostic Method for Superficial Skin Cancers

Journal

SEMINARS IN CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 190-195

Publisher

FRONTLINE MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS
DOI: 10.1016/j.sder.2009.06.007

Keywords

multiphoton laser scanning microscopy; fluorescence; skin cancer; optical biopsy; histopathology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing incidence of skin cancer and the importance of early diagnosis is a challenge, which requires the development of reliable, cost-effective, noninvasive, diagnostic techniques. Several such methods based on optical imaging techniques are available and currently being investigated. A novel method in this field is multiphoton laser scanning microscopy (MPLSM). This technique is based on the nonlinear process of 2-photon excitation of endogenous fluorophores, which can be used to acquire horizontal optical sectioning of intact biological tissue samples. When studying human skin, MPLSM provides high-resolution fluorescence imaging, allowing visualization of cellular and subcellular structures of the epidermis and upper dermis. This review covers the application of MPLSM as a diagnostic tool for superficial skin cancers, such as basal cell carcinomas, squamous cell carcinoma in situ, and melanomas. MPLSM has also been applied in other research areas related to skin, which will be mentioned briefly. The morphologic features observed in MPLSM images of skin tumors are comparable to traditional histopathology. Safety issues, limitations, and further improvements are discussed. Although further investigations are required to make MPLSM a mainstream clinical diagnostic tool, MPLSM has the potential of becoming a noninvasive, bedside, histopathologic technique for the diagnosis of superficial skin cancers. Semin Cutan Med Surg 28:190-195 (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available