4.6 Review

Ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3 as functional henipavirus receptors

Journal

SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 116-123

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.12.005

Keywords

Hendra; Nipah; Virus attachment; Ephrin

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS38486, U01AI077995]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Members of the ephrin cell-surface protein family interact with the Eph receptors, the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases, mediating bi-directional signaling during tumorogenesis and various developmental events. Surprisingly, ephrin-B2 and -B3 were recently identified as entry receptors for henipaviruses, emerging zoonotic paramyxoviruses responsible for repeated outbreaks in humans and animals in Australia, Southeast Asia, India and Bangladesh. Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus (HeV) are the only two identified members in the henipavirus genus. While the initial human infection cases came from contact with infected pigs (NiV) or horses (HeV), in the more recent outbreaks of NiV both food-borne and human-to-human transmission were reported. These characteristics, together with high mortality and morbidity rates and lack of effective anti-viral therapies, make the henipaviruses a potential biological-agent threat. Viral entry is an important target for the development of anti-viral drugs. The entry of henipavirus is initiated by the attachment of the viral G envelope glycoprotein to the host cell receptors ephrin-B2 and/or -B3, followed by activation of the F fusion protein, which triggers fusion between the viral envelop and the host membrane. We review recent progress in the study of henipavirus entry, particularly the identification of ephrins as their entry receptors, and the structural characterization of the ephrin/Henipa-G interactions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available