4.7 Article

Identification of disulfide cross-linked tau dimer responsible for tau propagation

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep15231

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology [2E25240, 2E25473]
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [1465016897]
  3. NRF
  4. WISET Grant - Ministry of Science, MSIP under the Program for Returners into RD [KW-2014-PPD-0076]
  5. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development by RDA [PJ009103]
  6. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) grant - Korea government (Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) [698214-14]
  7. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/CBRG/0015/2012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent evidence suggests that tau aggregates are not only neurotoxic, but also propagate in neurons acting as a seed for native tau aggregation. Prion-like tau transmission is now considered as an important pathogenic mechanism driving the progression of tau pathology in the brain. However, prion-like tau species have not been clearly characterized. To identify infectious tau conformers, here we prepared diverse tau aggregates and evaluated the effect on inducing intracellular tau-aggregation. Among tested, tau dimer containing P301L-mutation is identified as the most infectious form to induce tau pathology. Biochemical analysis reveals that P301L-tau dimer is covalently cross-linked with a disulfide bond. The relatively small and covalently cross-linked tau dimer induced tau pathology efficiently in primary neurons and also in tau-transgenic mice. So far, the importance of tau disulfide cross-linking has been overlooked in the study of tau pathology. Here our results suggested that tau disulfide cross-linking might play critical role in tau propagation by producing structurally stable and small tau conformers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available