4.4 Review

Methods of Formal Consensus in Classification/Diagnostic Criteria and Guideline Development

Journal

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 95-105

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.12.001

Keywords

guideline criteria; formal consensus methods; Delphi method; nominal group technique; RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method; National Institutes of Health consensus development; conference; GRADE; diagnostic criteria

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIAMS K23 AR053858-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guidelines or diagnostic criteria in clinical practice assist physicians in their clinical decision-making and improve health outcomes for patients. Diagnostic and classification criteria should be based on evidence from rigorously conducted controlled studies. Formal group consensus methods have been developed to organize subjective judgments and to synthesize them with the available evidence. This review discusses 4 types of formal consensus methods used in the health field and their applications in rheumatology: the Delphi method, Nominal Group Technique, RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, and National Institutes of Health consensus development conference. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41:95-105

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available