4.3 Article

The effect of levetiracetam monotherapy on subjective sleep quality and objective sleep parameters in patients with epilepsy: Compared with the effect of carbamazepine-CR monotherapy

Journal

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 336-339

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.01.006

Keywords

Partial epilepsy; Sleep; Polysomnography; Levetiracetam; Carbamazepine

Funding

  1. Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
  2. UCB Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: There is relatively little known about the effects of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on sleep. This study was done to evaluate the effect of levetiracetam (LEV) on subjective sleep quality and sleep architecture in patients with epilepsy, and the results were compared with the effects of carbamazepine-CR (CBZ-CR). Methods: This is a longitudinal randomized controlled trial using two different treatments, LEV (1000 mg/day) or CBZ-CR (400 mg/day). Thirty-one subjects (16 LEV and 15 CBZ-CR) had partial epilepsy and were tested with an overnight polysomnography (PSG) with full 10-20 electrodes. Sleep questionnaires and National Hospital Seizure severity Scale (NHS3) were evaluated. PSG and the questionnaires were repeated after 4-6 weeks of treatment. Results: In the LEV group, when treatment PSG findings were compared with baseline, there was a significant increase in sleep efficiency (p = 0.039) but no changes in subjective sleep parameters. In the CBZ-CR group, there was a significant increase in the percentage of slow wave sleep (p = 0.038) while other sleep parameters were not significantly changed after treatment. There were no significant differences in effects on sleep between the LEV and CBZ-CR groups. Conclusion: LEV may increase sleep efficiency without major effects on sleep structure with an overall effect on sleep parameters comparable to CBZ-CR. (C) 2011 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available