4.3 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid tau as a marker of neuronal damage after epileptic seizure

Journal

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 474-477

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.04.006

Keywords

Axonal damage; Cerebrospinal fluid; Epileptic seizure; Phosphorylated tau protein; Tau protein

Funding

  1. Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Whether repeated brief seizures can cause neuronal damage is controversial. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total tau (T-tau) and phosphorylated tau (P-tau) measurements have been suggested for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and T-tau may also be a marker of axonal damage and neuronal degeneration. We studied T-tau and P-tau levels and P-tau/T-tau ratio in CSF after epileptic seizures in order to determine whether they are increased after seizures. Methods: A total of 54 patients with tonic-clonic or partial secondarily generalized seizures due to various etiologies were studied and CSF obtained within 48 h after the seizure. Results: There were no statistical differences in the levels of T-tau (p = 0.09, ANOVA) or P-tau (p = 0.60) between different etiologic groups or controls. No patients with epilepsy of unknown origin had abnormal CSF T-tau whereas 11 patients with acute or remote symptomatic seizures had abnormal T-tau levels and the P-tau/T-tau ratio showed significant differences between the groups and controls (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Epileptic seizures with unknown etiology did not increase CSF tau levels. Abnormal tau levels were associated with either acute or remote symptomatic seizures with known etiology. The presence of elevated CSF tau increases the probability of symptomatic cause in a patient with a seizure. (C) 2009 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available