3.9 Article

Second-Order Motion is Less Efficient at Modulating Vection Strength

Journal

SEEING AND PERCEIVING
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 213-221

Publisher

BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/187847612X626390

Keywords

Vection; motion perception; first-order motion; second-order motion

Funding

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP1093493]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP1093493] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visually induced illusions of self-motion (vection) are often induced using constant velocity optic flow. However, adding simulated viewpoint jitter and oscillation to these displayscan significantly improve the vection experience (especially when this jitter/oscillation is orthogonal to the constant flow component - Nakamura, 2010; Palmisano et al., 2008). In the present experiment, we found that vection was only facilitated when luminance-, but not contrast-, defined vertical oscillatory motion was added to the constant horizontal display motion (even though observers clearly reported seeing both the oscillatory and constant display motions in both conditions). These findings demonstrate that the vection enhancement provided by simulated viewpoint oscillation is not simply based on the perceived display motion. (C) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available