4.6 Article

Exploring the temporal change in provenance encoded in the late Quaternary deposits of the Ganga Plain

Journal

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
Volume 293, Issue -, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.04.004

Keywords

Ganga Plain; Sr and Nd isotope ratio; Peninsular India; Himalaya

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi [SR/S4/ES-252/2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temporal analysis of Sr isotopes in soil carbonates and Sr and Nd isotopes in silicate fractions has been carried out in a sedimentary core (Kalpi core; 50 m long) raised from the southern bank of the Yamuna river, Ganga Plain, India. The aim of the study is to constrain sediment provenance through comparison with the modern Himalayan and peninsular river systems' water and bank sediments. Sr isotopic data in soil carbonates (0.71874 to 0.71410) and Sr-Nd isotopic data in silicate (0.72865 to 0.74544 and -13.9 to -17.2, respectively) vary significantly with depth and are indicative of both Himalayan and peninsular sources for sediments in the southern Ganga Plain. The positive correlation between Sr-87/Sr-86 ratio and 1/Sr in soil carbonate and the negative correlation between Sr-87/Sr-86 and epsilon Nd in silicate confirm mixing of sediments from these sources. Variations of 87Sr/86Sr ratios in soil carbonates show that at similar to 80 and 45 ka the Himalaya acted as the major source of sediments in the southern part of the Ganga Plain. The gradual decrease in Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios after 80 and 45 ka indicates change in source to peninsular India which is also supported by limited Sr and Nd isotope data in silicates. The change in sediment provenance corresponds well with the available climatic record and is suggestive of strong climatic control in sediment supply with high supply from the Himalaya during the interglacial period and peninsular sediments during glacial period. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available