4.1 Review

Voltage-gated Potassium Channel-associated Limbic Encephalitis in the West of Scotland: Case Reports and Literature Review

Journal

SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 27-31

Publisher

SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
DOI: 10.1258/rsmsmj.54.4.27

Keywords

Limbic encephalitis; temporal lobe; amnesia; voltage-gated potassium channel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims The syndrome of limbic encephalitis (LE) associated with antibodies against voltage-gated potassium channels (VGKC-LE) has recently been described. The number of published cases is however small. We therefore aimed to review all cases seen at our centre and compare with published cases. Methods Retrospective cases of VGKC-LE were identified using a questionnaire to Neurologists at the Southern General hospital, Glasgow, and by reviewing patients with a positive VGKC antibody test (2002-2007). Case-note review of identified cases and a literature review of all published cases of VGKC-LE were performed. Results Seven cases were identified (four female, age range 5181). Patients presented sub-acutely with seizures and anterograde memory loss. Five patients had medial temporal lobe change on cranial imaging. No paraneoplastic cases were identified. 5/7 patients made some improvement with immunotherapy. In 2006, 3/18 (17%) patients with a coded discharge of encephalitis were diagnosed with VGKC-LE. The literature review revealed 40 patients with VGKC-LE. Age, gender or VGKC level did not predict likelihood for a significant recovery. Patients treated :55 months of symptom onset with immunotherapy were more likely to make a significant recovery (83% vs. 45%, p=0.04). Conclusion VGKC-LE is being increasingly diagnosed and is best identified early and treated with immunotherapy to offer the greatest chance of recovery. This series and literature review expands the current published evidence in VGKC-LE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available