Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A SIMULATION OF DISAGREEMENT FOR CONTROL OF RATIONAL CHEATING IN PEER REVIEW
Francisco Grimaldo et al.
ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS (2013)
Scientific peer review
Lutz Bornmann
ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
On peer review in computer science: analysis of its effectiveness and suggestions for improvement
Azzurra Ragone et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2013)
A better alternative to the h index
Lutz Bornmann
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2013)
Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
RESEARCH POLICY (2013)
Towards a living earth simulator
M. Paolucci et al.
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS (2012)
Modeling peer review: an agent-based approach
Stefano Allesina
IDEAS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2012)
Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case
Jelte M. Wicherts
NATURE (2011)
The paper is not sacred
Adam Marcus et al.
NATURE (2011)
Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding
Paul J. Roebber et al.
PLOS ONE (2011)
For an Integrated Approach to Agent-Based Modeling of Science
Nicolas Payette
JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION (2011)
Social Simulation That 'Peers into Peer Review'
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION (2011)
Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers and editor behavior affect the rejection rate
David M. Schultz
SCIENTOMETRICS (2010)
A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures
Johan Bollen et al.
PLOS ONE (2009)
The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews
Lutz Bornmann et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2009)
Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication
Lutz Bornmann et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2008)
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
R Smith
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE (2006)
Sociology and simulation: Statistical and qualitative cross-validation
S Moss et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY (2005)
How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms
M Bunge
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES (2004)
A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings
UW Jayasinghe et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2003)
Effects of editorial peer review - A systematic review
T Jefferson et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Share Paper
