4.7 Article

Assessment of genetic diversity of Latvian and Swedish sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genetic resources collections by using SSR (microsatellite) markers

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages 451-457

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.03.016

Keywords

Prunus avium L.; Microsatellites; SSR; Germplasm; Genetic diversity

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning
  2. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry
  3. Swedish Institute (SI)
  4. Swedish Council for Forestry and Agricultural Research (SJFR)
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three previously described highly polymorphic SSR (rnicrosatellite) primer pairs were tested on 126 sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) accessions to adapt a fast, reliable method for preliminary screening of sweet cherry germplasm collections and to compare two sweet cherry germplasm collections: at the Latvia State Institute of Fruit-Growing, Dobele (LIFG-Dobele) and at the Division of Horticultural Genetics and Plant Breeding at Balsgard, Department of Crop Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU-Baisgard). The SSR loci were highly polymorphic with 4-10 different alleles and 5-18 genotypes. Heterozygosity values ranged from 0.431 to 0.809, gene diversity (PIC) values ranged front 0.400 to 0.753, and the discriminating power of each locus varied from 0.631 to 0.894. The combined discriminating power of all loci was highly effective (0.996). Sixteen identical accession groups With the same allele profile were discovered in both collections. This Study demonstrated that SSR fingerprinting with the three primer pairs tested, can be used for preliminary characterization of sweet cherry germplasm collections. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available