4.7 Article

Effect of distance from early flowering pollinizers 'Maypole' and 'Dolgo' on 'Fiji' fruit set

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 117, Issue 2, Pages 151-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.025

Keywords

pollen flow; apple pollinizers; S-RNase; SSR; 'Fuji'

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An apple orchard consisting of a single cultivar under the condition of natural pollination must have suitable pollinizers such as Crab apples to ensure stable fruit production. We selected 'Maypole' and 'Dolgo' as pollinizers for the cultivar 'Fuji', and investigated the rate of fruit and seeds in 'Fuji' fruits produced by pollen of the pollinizers. We developed a method for tracing pollen flow based on the leaf color of progeny and S-RNase allele of 'Maypole', and on Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) analyses of 'Maypole' and 'Dolgo'. These were powerful tools for determining the distance insects (mainly Osmia cornifrons) carry pollen from the pollinizers to 'Fuji'. Although the fruit set of 'Fuji' apples was not reduced with increasing distance between 'Fuji' apple trees and pollinizers (probably due to pollen flow from other commercial cultivars planted outside the area), the rate of 'Fuji' apple fruit produced by the pollen of the pollinizers decreased with increasing distance. The rate of fruit produced by the pollinizers was 84% and 77% when 'Fuji' was 2.5 m from 'Maypole' and 'Dolgo', respectively, and 71% and 64% when 'Fuji' was 5 m from 'Maypole' and 'Dolgo', respectively, but was reduced to 47% and 39% when 'Fuji' was 10 m from 'Maypole' and 'Dolgo', respectively. However, the spacing could cause reduced fruit size, and require extra fruit thinning for producing large fruits. It could also cause reduction of the yield for increasing the planting area of pollinizers. We recommend that pollinizers should be planted not more than 10 m from 'Fuji'. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available