Journal
ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 250-257Publisher
SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10511-015-9380-y
Keywords
galaxies; fundamental parameters; statistics
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11263005, 11165011]
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- University of Arizona
- Brazilian Participation Group
- Brookhaven National Laboratory
- University of Cambridge
- University of Florida
- French Participation Group
- German Participation Group
- Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
- Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
- Johns Hopkins University
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
- New Mexico State University
- New York University
- Ohio State University
- Pennsylvania State University
- University of Portsmouth
- Princeton University
- Spanish Participation Group
- University of Tokyo
- University of Utah
- Vanderbilt University
- University of Virginia
- University of Washington
- Yale University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this work, we continue to examine whether the u-, g-, i- and z-band concentration indices are a good morphological classification tool. Our statistical results demonstrate that compared with the r-band concentration index, the g-band concentration index may be a better choice for use as a parameter in automated morphological classification schemes. The u-band concentration index is the worst choice of the five photometric band concentration indices.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available
Share Paper
