4.8 Review

Microbiota-Targeted Therapies: An Ecological Perspective

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 137, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004183

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. W.M. Keck Foundation
  2. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  3. NIH [DP2 OD007290, DE020751, DP1OD000964]
  4. Children's Hospital Boston, Office of Faculty Development Career Development Fellowship
  5. Doris Duke Charitable Trust
  6. Thomas C. and Joan M. Merigan Endowment at Stanford University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The connection between disease and the disruption of homeostatic interactions between the host and its microbiota is now well established. Drug developers and clinicians are starting to rely more heavily on therapies that directly target the microbiota and on the ecology of the microbiota to understand the outcomes of these treatments. The effects of those microbiota-targeted therapies that alter community composition range in scale from eliminating individual strains of a single species (for example, with antibacterial conjugate vaccines) to replacing the entire community with a new intact microbiota (for example, by fecal transplantation). Secondary infections linked to antibiotic use provide a cautionary tale of the unintended consequences of perturbing a microbial species network and highlight the need for new narrow-spectrum antibiotics with rapid companion diagnostics. Insights into microbial ecology will also benefit the development of probiotics, whose therapeutic prospects will depend on rigorous clinical testing. Future probiotics may take the form of a consortium of long-term community residents: '' a fecal transplant in a capsule.'' The efficacy of microbiota-targeted therapies will need to be assessed using new diagnostic tools that measure community function rather than composition, including the temporal response of a microbial community to a defined perturbation such as an antibiotic or probiotic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available