4.8 Article

Dosage Thresholds for AAV2 and AAV8 Photoreceptor Gene Therapy in Monkey

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 3, Issue 88, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002103

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness
  3. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  4. Paul and Evanina Mackall Foundation Trust
  5. F. M. Kirby Foundation
  6. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS038690, NS007180, NS007413]
  7. National Center for Research Resources [UL1RR024134]
  8. Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics at the University of Pennsylvania
  9. ReGenX Holdings

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene therapy is emerging as a therapeutic modality for treating disorders of the retina. Photoreceptor cells are the primary cell type affected in many inherited diseases of retinal degeneration. Successfully treating these diseases with gene therapy requires the identification of efficient and safe targeting vectors that can transduce photoreceptor cells. One serotype of adeno-associated virus, AAV2, has been used successfully in clinical trials to treat a form of congenital blindness that requires transduction of the supporting cells of the retina in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Here, we determined the dose required to achieve targeting of AAV2 and AAV8 vectors to photoreceptors in nonhuman primates. Transgene expression in animals injected subretinally with various doses of AAV2 or AAV8 vectors carrying a green fluorescent protein transgene was correlated with surgical, clinical, and immunological observations. Both AAV2 and AAV8 demonstrated efficient transduction of RPE, but AAV8 was markedly better at targeting photoreceptor cells. These preclinical results provide guidance for optimal vector and dose selection in future human gene therapy trials to treat retinal diseases caused by loss of photoreceptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available