4.8 Article

Rapid Cancer Detection by Topically Spraying a γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase-Activated Fluorescent Probe

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 3, Issue 110, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002823

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [23249004, 20117003, 19205021]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20117003, 23249004] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of the unaided human eye to detect small cancer foci or accurate borders between cancer and normal tissue during surgery or endoscopy is limited. Fluorescent probes are useful for enhancing visualization of small tumors but are typically limited by either high background signal or the requirement for administration hours to days before use. We synthesized a rapidly activatable, cancer-selective fluorescence imaging probe, gamma-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green (gGlu-HMRG), with intramolecular spirocyclic caging for complete quenching. Activation occurs by rapid one-step cleavage of glutamate with gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), which is not expressed in normal tissue, but is overexpressed on the cell membrane of various cancer cells, thus leading to complete uncaging and dequenching of the fluorescence probe. In vitro activation of gGlu-HMRG was evident in 11 human ovarian cancer cell lines tested. In vivo in mouse models of disseminated human peritoneal ovarian cancer, activation of gGlu-HMRG occurred within 1 min of topically spraying the tumor, creating high signal contrast between the tumor and the background. The gGlu-HMRG probe is practical for clinical application during surgical or endoscopic procedures because of its rapid and strong activation upon contact with GGT on the surface of cancer cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available