4.5 Article

BRAF Inhibitors Induce Metastasis in RAS Mutant or Inhibitor-Resistant Melanoma Cells By Reactivating MEK and ERK Signaling

Journal

SCIENCE SIGNALING
Volume 7, Issue 318, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2004815

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Long-Term Fellowship
  2. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Melanoma Group
  3. Tegger Foundation
  4. Wenner-Gren Foundations, Stockholm
  5. International Association of Cancer Research [09-0773]
  6. Harry J. Lloyd Charitable Trust
  7. National Health Service (NHS)
  8. Cancer Research UK [C5759/A12738, C107/A10433, C309/A2187]
  9. ICR
  10. Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute
  11. Cancer Research UK [17240, 19279, 11566] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Melanoma is a highly metastatic and lethal form of skin cancer. The protein kinase BRAF is mutated in about 40% of melanomas, and BRAF inhibitors improve progression-free and overall survival in these patients. However, after a relatively short period of disease control, most patients develop resistance because of reactivation of the RAF-ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) pathway, mediated in many cases by mutations in RAS. We found that BRAF inhibition induces invasion and metastasis in RAS mutant melanoma cells through a mechanism mediated by the reactivation of the MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase)-ERK pathway, increased expression and secretion of interleukin 8, and induction of protease-dependent invasion. These events were accompanied by a cell morphology switch from predominantly rounded to predominantly elongated cells. We also observed similar responses in BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells. These data show that BRAF inhibitors can induce melanoma cell invasion and metastasis in tumors that develop resistance to these drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available