4.7 Article

Arsenate adsorption onto iron oxide amended rice husk char

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 488, Issue -, Pages 558-565

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.120

Keywords

Arsenic; Adsorption; Rice husk char; Iron oxide; Surface area; Pore size

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need Fellowship
  3. David Ross Boyd Professorship at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma
  4. OU WaTER Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, rice husks were charred at 550 degrees C in a partially sealed ceramic vessel for 30 minutes to create a high specific surface area (SSA) rice husk char (RHC). The RHC was then amended with iron oxides using dissolved ferric nitrate, Fe(NO3)(3) center dot 9H2O, to provide a surface chemistry conducive to arsenic adsorption. The 550 degrees C iron oxide amended rice husk char's (550 IOA-RHC's) SSA was nearly 2.5 orders of magnitude higher and the arsenate adsorptive level was nearly 2 orders of magnitude higher than those reported for iron oxide amended sand, thus indicating a positive relationship between post-amendment SSA and arsenate adsorptive levels. Rice husks were then charred at temperatures ranging from 450 degrees C to 1050 degrees C to create an even higher SSA material, which might further increase arsenate adsorptive levels. The 950 degrees C RHC was chosen for amendment due to its high SSA and feasibility of being produced in the field. Once amended, the 950 degrees C iron oxide amended rice husk char (950 IOA-RHC) improved the arsenate adsorption capacity by thus confirming a positive relationship, though not a linear relationship, between post-amendment SSA and arsenic adsorptive capacity. Further study demonstrated that post-amendment mesoporous volume and mesoporous surface area appear to be better indicators of arsenic adsorptive capacity than SSA or iron content. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available