Journal
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 488, Issue -, Pages 252-260Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.085
Keywords
Tilapia; Persistent organic pollutants (POPs); PCBs; DDTs; BFRs; Tanzania
Categories
Funding
- Research Council of Norway (NFR) [204051]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In Tanzania fish is one of the most important protein sources for the rapidly increasing population. Wild fish is threatened by overfishing and pollution from agriculture, industries, mining, household effluents and vector control. To monitor possible implications for public health, the geographical differences of the occurrence and levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in tilapia fish (Oreochromis sp.) from four different Tanzanian lakes were investigated in 2011. Concentrations of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyls (PBDEs) and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) were determined in pooled samples of tilapia muscle from Lake (L) Victoria, L Tanganyika, L Nyasa (also called L Malawi) and L Babati in Tanzania in 2011. Levels of Sigma-DDTs (274 ng/g lipid weight (Iw)) and sum of 7 indicator PCBs (Sigma-7PCBs) (17 ng/g Iw) were significantly higher in tilapia from L Tanganyika compared to the other lakes. The highest levels of Sigma-endosulfan (94 ng/g Iw) were detected in tilapia from L Victoria. Toxaphenes were detected in low levels in fish from L Tanganyika and L Babati. Results revealed a geographic difference in the use of DDT and endosulfan between L Victoria and L Tanganyika. Low ratios of DDE/DDT in tilapia from L Tanganyika indicated an on-going use of DDT in the area. Median levels of Sigma BDEs, including BDE-209, were highest in L Victoria (19.4 ng/g Iw) and BDE-209 was present in 68% of the samples from this lake. The presence of BDE-209 indicates increasing influence of imported products from heavy industrialized countries. The measured POP levels in the studied tilapia were all below MRLs of EU or were lower than recommended levels, and thus the fish is considered as safe for human consumption. They may, however, pose a risk to the fish species and threaten biodiversity. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available