4.7 Article

Environmental assessment of two different crop systems in terms of biomethane potential production

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 466, Issue -, Pages 1066-1077

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.109

Keywords

Energy crops; Anaerobic digestion; Life cycle assessment; Environmental sustainability; Biogas

Funding

  1. Regione Lombardia - Fondo per la Promozione di Accordi Istituzionali [BIOGESTECA 15083/RCC]
  2. FSE - Regione Lombardia
  3. Regione Lombardia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interest in renewable energy sources has gained great importance in Europe due to the need to reduce fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, as required by the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) of the European Parliament. The production of energy from energy crops appears to be consistent with RED. The environmental impact related to this kind of energy primarily originates from crop cultivation. This research aimed to evaluate the environmental impact of different crop systems for biomass production: single and double crop. The environmental performances of maize and maize plus wheat were assessed from a life cycle perspective. Two alternative scenarios considering different yields, crop management, and climatic conditions, were also addressed. One normal cubic metre of potential methane was chosen as a functional unit. Methane potential production data were obtained through lab experimental tests. For both of the crop systems, the factors that have the greatest influence on the overall environmental burden are: fertilizer emissions, diesel fuel emissions, diesel fuel production, and pesticide production. Notwithstanding the greater level of methane potential production, the double crop system appears to have the worse environmental performance with respect to its single crop counterpart. This result is due to the bigger quantity of inputs needed for the double crop system. Therefore, the greater amount of biomass (silage) obtained through the double crop system is less than proportional to the environmental burden that results from the bigger quantity of inputs requested for double crop. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available