Journal
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 499, Issue -, Pages 319-326Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.047
Keywords
Passive sampling; Water velocity; Silicone rubber (SR); Low density polyethylene (LDPE); Performance reference compounds (PRC); Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)
Categories
Funding
- Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
One aim of this study is to determine the impact of water velocity on the uptake of indicator polychlorinated biphenyls (iPCBs) by silicone rubber (SR) and low-density polyethylene (LOPE) passive samplers. A second aim is to assess the efficiency of performance reference compounds (PRCs) to correct for the impact of water velocity. SR and LOPE samplers were spiked with 11 or 12 PRCs and exposed for 6 weeks to four different velocities (in the range of 1.6 to 37.7 cm s(-1)) in river-like flow conditions using a channel system supplied with river water. A relationship between velocity and the uptake was found for each iPCB and enables to determine expected changes in the uptake due to velocity variations. For both samplers, velocity increases from 2 to 10 cm s(-1), 30 cm s(-1) (interpolated data) and 100 cm s(-1) (extrapolated data) lead to increases of the uptake which do not exceed a factor of 2,3 and 4.5, respectively. Results also showed that the influence of velocity decreased with increasing the octanol water coefficient partition (log K-ow of iPCBs when SR is used whereas the opposite effect was observed for LOPE. Time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations of iPCBs in water were calculated from iPCB uptake and PRC release. These calculations were performed using either a single PRC or all the PRCs. The efficiency of PRCs to correct the impact of velocity was assessed by comparing the TWA concentrations obtained at the four tested velocities. For SR, a good agreement was found among the four TWA concentrations with both methods (average RSD < 10%). Also for LOPE, PACs offered a good correction of the impact of water velocity (average RSD of about 10 to 20%). These results contribute to the process of acceptance of passive sampling in routine regulatory monitoring programs. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available