4.7 Article

Short-term effects of PM2.5, PM10 and PM2.5-10 on daily mortality in the Netherlands

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 463, Issue -, Pages 20-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.062

Keywords

Mortality; Time series; Particulate matter; PM2.5; PM10; Coarse particles

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Information on the relationship between levels of particulate matter (PM) smaller than 2.5 mu m and mortality rates in Europe is relatively sparse because of limited availability of PM2.5 measurement data. Even less information is available on the health effects attributable to PM2.5-10, especially for North-West Europe. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between various PM size fractions and daily mortality rates. Methods: Daily concentrations of PM from the Dutch National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network as well as all cause and cause-specific mortality rates in the Netherlands were obtained for the period 2008-2009. Poisson regression analysis using generalized additive models was used, with adjustment for potential confounding including long-term and seasonal trends, influenza incidence, meteorological variables, day of the week, and holidays. Different measures of PM (PM2.5, PM10 and PM2.5-10) were analysed. Results: PM10 and PM2.5 levels were statistically significantly (p < 0.05) associated with all cause and cause-specific deaths. For example, a 10 mu g/m(3) increase in previous day PM was associated with 0.8% (95% CI 0.3-1.2) excess risk in all cause mortality for PM2.3 and a 0.6% (CI 0.2-1.0) excess risk for PM10. No appreciable associations were observed for PM2.5-10. Effects of PM10, and PM2.5 were insensitive to adjustment for PM2.5-10, and vice-versa. PM10 and PM2.5 were too highly correlated to disentangle their independent effects. Conclusions: PM10 and PM2.5 both were significantly associated with all cause and cause-specific mortality. We were unable to demonstrate significant effects for PM2.5-10, possibly due to the lower temporal variability and the higher exposure misclassification in PM2.5-10 compared to. PM10 or PM2.5. The lack of effects of PM2.5-10 in our study should therefore not be interpreted as an indication that PM2.5-10 can be considered harmless. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available