4.7 Article

HBCD and TBBPA in particulate phase of indoor air in Shenzhen, China

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 458, Issue -, Pages 15-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.003

Keywords

Hexabromocyclododecane; Tetrabromobisphenol A; Particulate phase of indoor air; Human exposure; Shenzhen

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071303]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012ZX07503-003-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hexabromocyclododecane diastereoisomers (alpha, beta, and gamma-HBCD) and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) were investigated in air conditioning filter dust (designated as particulate phase of indoor air, PPIA) collected from an office building in Shenzhen, China in 2009. Concentrations of Sigma HBCD (sum of alpha-, beta-, and gamma-HBCD) ranged from 652 to 122, 973 ng/g in PPIA. Generally, gamma-HBCD was the most abundant diastereomer. Concentrations of TBBPA ranged from 30 to 59, 140 ng/g in PPIA. According to our results, approximate 61.9 pg/kg body weight/day (pg/kg/d) PM2.5 bound Sigma HBCD can be inhaled deep into the lungs and 313 pg/kg/d PM10 bound Sigma HBCD tends to be deposited in the upper parts of the respiratory system, and those values of TBBPA were 28.7 pg/kg/d and 14.5 pg/kg/d for the lower and upper respiratory tracts, respectively. The average intakes of Sigma HBCD via dust inhalation and ingestion were 37.92 pg/kg/d and 2, 079 pg/kg/d for adults, and those data of TBBPA were 17.62 pg/kg/d and 966.2 pg/kg/d, respectively. Our research found that exposure via indoor dust inhalation and ingestion contributed more than dietary pathway. Sensitivity analysis result suggests that the concentration of HBCD and TBBPA is the most significant parameter governing estimated results, and the other parameters, such as body weight and inhalation rate, do not affect the outcome much. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available