4.7 Article

Exposure assessment and distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contained in indoor and outdoor dusts and the impacts of particle size and bioaccessibility

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 463, Issue -, Pages 1201-1209

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.059

Keywords

Polychlorinated biphenyl; Indoor and outdoor dust; Particle size fraction; Bioaccessibility; Carcinogenic hazard (TEQ); Health risk assessment

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong: GRF [HKBU 260209, N_HKBU210/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The size fraction, bioaccessibility and associated human daily intake of PCBs via indoor and outdoor dust collected from two most populated urban centers of Pearl River Delta (PRD), China, were studied. The Sigma PCBs levels (ng g(-1)) in indoor (51.9-264) and outdoor (4.02-228) dust in Guangzhou (GZ) were found higher than those in indoor (17.4-137) and outdoor (7.75-114) dust of Hong Kong (HK). Hexa-PCB was the largest contributor in dust samples (29-64%), followed by tri-PCB. The size fraction of PCBs indicated a high accumulation effect of particles less than 63 mu m, while the lowest was found in 280-2000 mu m. Toxic equivalency (TEQ) of dioxin-like PCBs in indoor dust of GZ and HK was 2 to 13 times higher than that in outdoor dust. The bioaccessibility of PCBs was determined as 5-61% depending on individual PCB congeners under study and bioaccessible PCB exposure was significantly lower than the estimate for total PCB. The daily intake of bioaccessible PCBs via dust ranged in 0.02-8.95 and 0.37-17.8 ng day(-1) in GZ while 0.01-4.95 and 0.16-9.83 ng day(-1) in HK for adults and children, respectively. Dust ingestion contributed to 0.49-10.6% of overall non-dietary PCB exposure (dust ingestion and inhalation) for adults while 12.9-35% for children, indicating the dominant contribution from inhalation. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available