4.7 Article

A study of diurnal variations of PM2.5 acidity and related chemical species using a new thermodynamic equilibrium model

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 452, Issue -, Pages 286-295

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.062

Keywords

Aerosol acidity; In-situ aerosol pH; Thermodynamic model; AIM-IV; Secondary inorganic aerosols; Ammonium to sulfate ratio

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Singapore [R-706-002-101-281]
  2. NRF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aerosol acidity is one of the most important parameters that can influence atmospheric visibility, climate change and human health. Based on continuous field measurements of inorganic aerosol species and their thermodynamic modeling on a time resolution of 1 h, this study has investigated the acidic properties of PM2.5 and their relation with the formation of secondary inorganic aerosols (SIA). The study was conducted by taking into account the prevailing ambient temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) in a tropical urban atmosphere. The in-situ aerosol pH (pH(IS)) on a 12 h basis ranged from -0.20 to 1.46 during daytime with an average value of 0.48 and 0.23 to 1.53 during nighttime with an average value of 0.72. These diurnal variations suggest that the daytime aerosol was more acidic than that caused by the nighttime aerosol. The hourly values of pH(IS) showed a reverse trend as compared to that of in-situ aerosol acidity ([H+](Ins)). The pH(IS) had its maximum values at 3:00 and at 20:00 and its minimum during 11:00 to 12:00. Correlation analyses revealed that the molar concentration ratio of ammonium to sulfate (R-N/S), equivalent concentration ratio of cations to anions (R-C/A), T and RH can be used as independent variables for prediction of pH(IS). A multi-linear regression model consisting of R-N/S, R-C/A, T and RH was developed to estimate aerosol pH(IS). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available