4.7 Review

Bioreceptivity of building stones: A review

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 426, Issue -, Pages 1-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.026

Keywords

Bioreceptivity; Stone; Microorganisms; Cultural heritage; Colonization experiments

Funding

  1. CRUP (Accoes Integradas Luso-Espanholas) [E-110/10]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [Accion Integrada PT2009-0041, CSD2007-00058]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia-Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior [SFRH/BPD/63836/2009]
  4. CEPGIST FCT
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and innovation
  6. Spanish Ministry of Education [BES-2007-16996, AP2009-4421]
  7. Programa de Financiamento Plurianual de Unidades de Investigacao da FCT
  8. European Union
  9. national budget of the Portuguese Republic
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/63836/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 1995, Guillitte defined bioreceptivity, a new term in ecology, as the ability of a material to be colonized by living organisms. Information about the bioreceptivity of stone is of great importance since it will help us to understand the material properties which influence the development of biological colonization in the built environment, and will also provide useful information as regards selecting stones for the conservation of heritage monuments and construction of new buildings. Studies of the bioreceptivity of stone materials are reviewed here with the aim of providing a clear set of conclusions on the topic. Definitions of bioreceptivity are given, stone bioreceptivity experiments are described, and finally the stone properties related to bioreceptivity are discussed. We suggest that a standardized laboratory protocol for evaluating stone bioreceptivity and definition of a stone bioreceptivity index are required to enable creation of a database on the primary bioreceptivity of stone materials. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available