4.7 Article

Development of spatial water resources vulnerability index considering climate change impacts

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 409, Issue 24, Pages 5228-5242

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.027

Keywords

Climate change; DPSIR; Vulnerability; SDSM; TOPSIS

Funding

  1. Research Center for Flood Defense Technology for the Next Generation in the Korean Institute of Construction & Transportation Technology Evaluation and Planning (KICTEP) of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM) [08-Tech-Inovation-F01]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0010609]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a new framework to quantify spatial vulnerability for sustainable water resources management. Four hydrologic vulnerability indices - potential flood damage (PFDC), potential drought damage (PDDC), potential water quality deterioration (PWQDC), and watershed evaluation index (WEIC) - were modified to quantify flood damage, drought damage, water quality deterioration, and overall watershed risk considering the impact of climate change, respectively. The concept of sustainability in the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework was applied in selecting all appropriate indicators (criteria) of climate change impacts. In the examination of climate change, future meteorological data was obtained using CGCM3 (Canadian Global Coupled Model) and SDSM (Statistical Downscaling Model), and future stream run-off and water quality were simulated using HSPF (Hydrological Simulation Program - Fortran). The four modified indices were then calculated using TOPSIS, a multi-attribute method of decision analysis. As a result, the ranking obtained can be changed in consideration of climate change impacts. This study represents a new attempt to quantify hydrologic vulnerability in a manner that takes into account both climate change impacts and the concept of sustainability. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available