4.7 Article

Interaction of Galaxolide® with the human and trout estrogen receptor-α

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 408, Issue 24, Pages 6158-6164

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.027

Keywords

Estrogen receptor; Polycyclic musks; HHCB; DEP; Galaxolide

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. NSERC
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarships program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic musks have been detected in sewage effluents surface waters and fish tissues where the polycyclic musk compound HHCB (Galaxolide (R)) is the dominant compound in those matrices In the present study the Galaxolide (R) formulation was tested in the yeast estrogenicity screening (YES) assay and also tested in in vitro and in vivo teleost systems to determine whether it interacts with the estrogen receptor as either an agonist or antagonist. In those tests Galaxolide (R) did not act as an estrogen agonist, however there was strong evidence of antagonistic activity as Galaxolide (R) inhibited the estrogenic activity of 17 beta-estradiol (E2) In the YES assay based on a recombinant strain of yeast containing the human estrogen receptor (i e hER alpha), Galaxolide (R) inhibited the effects of E2 in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 =1 63 x 10(-5) M) In a luciferase reporter gene assay based on the rainbow trout estrogen receptor e rtER) transfected into a rainbow trout gonadal (RTG-2) cell line the IC50 for the antagonistic effect of Galaxolide (R) was 2 79 x 10-9 M In an in vivo assay based on modulation of vitellogenin in rainbow trout Galaxolide (R) i p injected into trout at a dose of 3 64 mg/kg caused inhibition of E2-induced vitellogenin production That dose is within the range of concentrations of Galaxolide (R) that have been detected in tissues of fish from contaminated locations (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available