4.7 Article

Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: An empirical approach for Spain

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 408, Issue 4, Pages 953-957

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.028

Keywords

Distance functions; Economic valuation; Environmental benefits; Shadow prices; Undesirable outputs; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. Spanish Government through NOVEDAR Project [CSD2007-00055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Economic research into the design and implementation of policies for the efficient management of water resources has been emphasized by the European Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC). The efficient implementation of policies to prevent the degradation and depletion of water resources requires determining their value in social and economic terms and incorporating this information into the decision-making process. A process of wastewater treatment has many associated environmental benefits. However, these benefits are often not calculated because they are not set by the market, due to inadequate property rights, the presence of externalities, and the lack of perfect information. Nevertheless. the valuation of these benefits is necessary to justify a suitable investment policy and a limited number of studies exist on the subject of the economic valuation of environmental benefits. In this paper, we propose a methodology based on the estimation of shadow prices for the pollutants removed in a treatment process. This value represents the environmental benefit (avoided cost) associated with undischarged pollution. This is a pioneering approach to the economic valuation of wastewater treatment. The comparison of these benefits with the internal costs of the treatment process will provide a useful indicator for the feasibility of wastewater treatment projects. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available