4.7 Article

Parameter uncertainty analysis of non-point source pollution from different land use types

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 408, Issue 8, Pages 1971-1978

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.007

Keywords

Non-point source pollution; First-order error analysis (FOEA); Parameter uncertainty; Land use

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40771193]
  2. State Key Lab of Water Environment Simulation [08ESPCT-Z]
  3. Nonprofit Environment Protection Specific Project of China [200709024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Land use type is one of the most important factors that affect the uncertainty in non-point source (NPS) pollution simulation. In this study, seventeen sensitive parameters were screened from the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for parameter uncertainty analysis for different land use types in the Daning River Watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. First-Order Error Analysis (FOEA) method was adopted to analyze the effect of parameter uncertainty on model outputs under three types of land use, namely, plantation, forest and grassland. The model outputs selected in this study consisted of runoff, sediment yield, organic nitrogen (N), and total phosphorus (TP). The results indicated that the uncertainty conferred by the parameters differed among the three land use types. In forest and grassland, the parameter uncertainty in NPS pollution was primarily associated with runoff processes, but in plantation, the main uncertain parameters were related to runoff process and soil properties. Taken together, the study suggested that adjusting the structure of land use and controlling fertilizer use are helpful methods to control the NPS pollution in the Daning River Watershed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available