4.7 Article

Assessment of chromium biostabilization in contaminated soils using standard leaching and sequential extraction techniques

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 407, Issue 2, Pages 925-936

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.020

Keywords

Chromate; Contaminated soils; Stabilization; Sequential extraction procedure; Iron reducing bacteria

Funding

  1. European Social Fund
  2. Greek National Resources
  3. Operational Program for Educational and Vocational Training II (EPEAEK II)
  4. Program PYTHAGORAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The iron reducing microorganism Desulfuromonas palmitatis was evaluated as potential biostabilization agent for the remediation of chromate contaminated soils. D. palmitatis were used for the treatment of soil samples artificially contaminated with Cr(VI) at two levels, i.e. 200 and 500 mg kg(-1). The efficiency of the treatment was evaluated by applying several standard extraction techniques on the soil samples before and after treatment, such as the EN12457 standard leaching test, the US EPA 3060A alkaline digestion method and the BCR sequential extraction procedure. The water soluble chromium as evaluated with the EN leaching test, was found to decrease after the biostabilization treatment from 13 to less than 0.5 mg kg(-1) and from 120 to 5.6 mg kg(-1) for the soil samples contaminated with 200 and 500 mg Cr(VI) per kg soil respectively. The BCR sequential extraction scheme, although not providing accurate estimates about the initial chromium speciation in contaminated soils, proved to be a useful tool for monitoring the relative changes in element partitioning, as a consequence of the stabilization treatment. After bioreduction, the percentage of chromium retained in the two least soluble BCR fractions, i.e. the oxidizable and residual fractions, increased from 54 and 73% to more than 96% in both soils. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available