4.7 Article

Process analysis of typical summertime ozone episodes over the Beijing area

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 399, Issue 1-3, Pages 147-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.013

Keywords

ozone; air quality model; process analysis; Beijing; urban downwind area

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2008 Summer Olympic Games will be held in Beijing; however, summer is the season in which Beijing is marked by frequent high-O-3 episodes. Observation analysis reveals that the urban plume is transported by a southerly wind and undergoes chemical reaction during propagation, resulting in the common occurrence of high O-3 concentrations in the urban downwind area; this is the typical scenario of the formation of high summertime O-3 levels over the Beijing area. The typical high-O-3 episode is well reproduced by the 3-dimensional air-quality model CMAQ-MADRID (Community Multi-scale Air-Quality Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization, and Dissolution). Radical cycle analysis reveals that the Beijing urban area was in a VOC-limited regime for O-3 formation, while the urban downwind area changed gradually to a NOx-limited condition. The urban downwind area, Dingling, is readily affected by intrusion of the urban plume. Detailed process analysis indicated that although the O-3 peaks reached the same level on 26 and 27 June 2000, the dominant process contributing to the O-3 increase was different on each day. on 26 June, the major contributor to the O-3 peak at Dingling was the arrival of high O-3 levels with propagation of the urban plume; in contrast, on 27 June O-3 precursors were transported rapidly to the urban downwind area by strong transportation processes that occurred earlier than those on the previous day, resulting in O-3 production by local photochemistry becoming the major contributor to the high-O-3 episode. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available