4.7 Review

A review of heavy-duty legged robots

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 298-314

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-013-5443-7

Keywords

heavy-duty legged robot; mechanical structure; force distribution; control method; power source

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB035502]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Project with Russia [2010DFR70270]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51275106]
  4. 111 Project [B07018]
  5. Key Laboratory Opening Funding of Aerospace Mechanism and Control [HIT. KLOF. 2010057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heavy-duty legged robots have been regarded as one of the important developments in the field of legged robots because of their high payload-total mass ratio, terrain adaptability, and multitasking. The problems associated with the development and use of heavy-duty legged robots have motivated researchers to conduct many important studies, covering topics related to the mechanical structure, force distribution, control strategy, energy efficiency, etc. Overall, heavy-duty legged robots have three main characteristics: greater body masses, larger body sizes, and higher payload-total mass ratios. Thus, various heavy-duty legged robots and their performances are reviewed here. This review presents the current developments with regard to heavy-duty legged robots. Also, the main characteristics of high-performance heavy-duty legged robots are determined and conclusions are drawn. Furthermore, the current research of key techniques of heavy-duty legged robots, including the mechanical structure, force distribution, control method, and power source, is described. To assess the transportation capacity of heavy-duty legged robots, performance evaluation parameters are proposed. Finally, problems that need further research are addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available