4.2 Article

Searches for small-scale anisotropies from neutrino point sources with three years of IceCube data

Journal

ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 39-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.01.001

Keywords

Extraterrestrial neutrinos; Astrophysical neutrinos; Point sources; IceCube; 2pt-correlation; Multipole analysis

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation-Office of Polar Programs
  2. US National Science Foundation-Physics Division
  3. University of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  4. Grid Laboratory Of Wisconsin (GLOW) grid infrastructure at the University of Wisconsin - Madison
  5. Open Science Grid (OSG) grid infrastructure
  6. US Department of Energy
  7. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  8. Louisiana Optical Network Initiative (LONI) grid computing resources
  9. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  10. WestGrid and Compute/Calcul Canada
  11. Swedish Research Council
  12. Swedish Polar Research Secretariat
  13. Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC)
  14. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden
  15. German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF)
  16. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  17. Helmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle Physics (HAP)
  18. Research Department of Plasmas with Complex Interactions (Bochum), Germany
  19. Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS-FWO), FWO Odysseus programme, Flanders Institute
  20. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (Belspo)
  21. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  22. Marsden Fund, New Zealand
  23. Australian Research Council
  24. Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  25. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), Switzerland
  26. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  27. Danish National Research Foundation, Denmark (DNRF)
  28. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000507/1, ST/L000474/1, PP/C506205/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  29. STFC [ST/L000474/1, PP/C506205/1, ST/J000507/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  30. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1307472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  31. Division Of Physics [1307472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  32. Division Of Physics
  33. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1205403] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  34. Division Of Physics
  35. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1403586] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, IceCube found evidence for a diffuse signal of astrophysical neutrinos in an energy range of similar to 60 TeV to the PeV-scale [1]. The origin of those events, being a key to understanding the origin of cosmic rays, is still an unsolved question. So far, analyses have not succeeded to resolve the diffuse signal into point-like sources. Searches including a maximum-likelihood-ratio test, based on the reconstructed directions and energies of the detected down- and up-going neutrino candidates, were also performed on IceCube data leading to the exclusion of bright point sources. In this paper, we present two methods to search for faint neutrino point sources in three years of IceCube data, taken between 2008 and 2011. The first method is an autocorrelation test, applied separately to the northern and southern sky. The second method is a multipole analysis, which expands the measured data in the northern hemisphere into spherical harmonics and uses the resulting expansion coefficients to separate signal from background. With both methods, the results are consistent with the background expectation with a slightly more sparse spatial distribution, corresponding to an underfluctuation. Depending on the assumed number of sources, the resulting upper limit on the flux per source in the northern hemisphere for an E-2 energy spectrum ranges from similar to 1.5. 10(-8) GeV/cm(2) s(-1), in the case of one assumed source, to similar to 4. 10(-10) GeV/cm(2) s(-1), in the case of 3500 assumed sources. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available