4.6 Review

How to identify dislocations in molecular dynamics simulations?

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY
Volume 57, Issue 12, Pages 2177-2187

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11433-014-5617-8

Keywords

dislocations; defects; MD simulation; structural characterization; hydraulic fracturing (fracking)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11372313, 11002011, 11202213]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZD-EW-M01]
  3. Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y2010031]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dislocations are of great importance in revealing the underlying mechanisms of deformed solid crystals. With the development of computational facilities and technologies, the observations of dislocations at atomic level through numerical simulations are permitted. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation suggests itself as a powerful tool for understanding and visualizing the creation of dislocations as well as the evolution of crystal defects. However, the numerical results from the large-scale MD simulations are not very illuminating by themselves and there exist various techniques for analyzing dislocations and the deformed crystal structures. Thus, it is a big challenge for the beginners in this community to choose a proper method to start their investigations. In this review, we summarized and discussed up to twelve existing structure characterization methods in MD simulations of deformed crystal solids. A comprehensive comparison was made between the advantages and disadvantages of these typical techniques. We also examined some of the recent advances in the dynamics of dislocations related to the hydraulic fracturing. It was found that the dislocation emission has a significant effect on the propagation and bifurcation of the crack tip in the hydraulic fracturing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available