4.6 Article

High-performance proton exchange membranes for direct methanol fuel cells based on a SPEEK/polybenzoxazine crosslinked structure

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 59, Pages 47284-47293

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra06073g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Breeding Project [2014PYZ2013]
  2. Scientific Research Innovation Team of Southwest Petroleum University [2013XJZT005]
  3. Major Breeding Project of the Education Department of Sichuan Province [13CZ0027]
  4. Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of Sichuan Province, P.R. China [2012JQ0035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfonated poly(etheretherketone)/polybenzoxazine (SPEEK/PBa) crosslinked blends were prepared as a proton exchange membrane (PEM) for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFCs) application. SPEEK catalyzed the ring-opening polymerization of benzoxazine (Ba) monomers and then reacted with PBa to form a crosslinked membrane with greatly improved mechanical integrity. Extraction testing, Fourier-transform infrared, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results indicate that the crosslinking reaction took place at 150 degrees C between the SPEEK and PBa. The crosslinked SPEEK/PBa structure gives a better dimensional stability, thermal stability, and mechanical integrity than the SPEEK membrane alone. The proton conductivity of the SPEEK/PBa-15% membrane is 4.25 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) at 30 degrees C, and reaches 2.46 x 10(-2) S cm(-1) at 80 degrees C. The methanol diffusion coefficient of the SPEEK/PBa-15% is reduced by 93% when compared to a Nafion-117 membrane under the same testing conditions. The maximum selectivity at 80 degrees C is 4.45 x 10(3) S s cm(-3) for SPEEK/PBa-15%, which is nearly 1.3 times higher than that of a Nafion-117 membrane. The observed excellent properties of SPEEK/PBa membranes are attributed to the uniformly crosslinked structure of SPEEK/PBa and the rigid backbone of PBa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available