4.6 Article

Effectiveness of carbon nanotube-cobalt ferrite nanocomposites for the adsorption of rhodamine B from aqueous solutions

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 29, Pages 22724-22739

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra15446k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficiency of adsorption of rhodamine B (RhB) from aqueous solution was investigated through a series of batch experiments by using cobalt ferrite nanoparticles (CoFe2O4), acid-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH) and carbon nanotube-cobalt ferrite nanocomposites. The adsorption capacity was evaluated as a function of pH, contact time, adsorbent dose, dye concentration and temperature. The effect of increasing the percentage of MWCNT-COOH in the nanocomposites was also studied. The adsorption capacity was lowest in CoFe2O4 (5.165 mg g(-1)) and highest with MWCNT-COOH (42.68 mg g(-1)). For the nanocomposites, the adsorption capacity was enhanced with an increase in the amount of MWCNT-COOH. The optimum pH for adsorption was observed at 7 at which equilibrium was reached after 360 min. The kinetics of adsorption was fitted to the pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, Elovich and intraparticle diffusion models. The results showed that the pseudo-second order model best described the data as reflected in the lowest value for the sum of squared residuals. Among the various adsorption isotherms tested, the Langmuir isotherm provided the best fit to the equilibrium data. The thermodynamic parameters, Delta H degrees, Delta S degrees and Delta G degrees, were obtained over a temperature range of 20-45 degrees C. Adsorption was spontaneous, endothermic and entropy-driven, except for one of the doped nanocomposites for which adsorption was exothermic. A good desorption of RhB from the loaded adsorbents was obtained by using either acetone or ethanol with a desorption efficiency in the range of 62-95%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available