4.7 Article

Root growth in response to nitrogen supply in Chinese maize hybrids released between 1973 and 2009

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 54, Issue 7, Pages 642-650

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-011-4186-6

Keywords

Root; R/S ratio; nitrogen; relative growth rate; maize breeding

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB11860]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31071852, 30821003]
  3. Special Fund for Agriculture Profession [201103003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root growth has a fundamental role in nitrogen (N) use efficiency. Nevertheless, little is known about how modern breeding progress has affected root growth and its responses to N supply. The root and shoot growth of a core set of 11 representative Chinese maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids released between 1973 and 2009 were investigated under high N (4 mmol L-1, HN) and low N (0.04 mmol L-1, LN) levels in a solution culture system. Compared with LN, HN treatment decreased root dry weight (RDW), the root: shoot ratio (R/S), and the relative growth rate for root dry weight (RGR(root)), but increased the total root length (TRL) and the total lateral root length (LRL). The total axial root length (ARL) per plant was reduced under HN, mostly in hybrids released before the 1990s. The number of seminal roots (SRN) was largely unaffected by different N levels. More recently released hybrids showed higher relative growth rates in the shoot under both HN and LN. However, the roots only showed increased RGR under HN treatment. Correspondingly, there was a positive linear relationship with the year of hybrid release for TRL, LRL and ARL under HN treatment. Together, these results suggest that while shoot growth of maize has improved, its root growth has only improved under high N conditions over the last 36 years of selective breeding in China. Improving root growth under LN conditions may be necessary to increase the N use efficiency of maize.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available