4.7 Article

A meta-analysis of oxidative stress markers in schizophrenia

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 112-124

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-010-0013-8

Keywords

schizophrenia; oxidative stress; meta-analysis; lipid peroxidation; nitric oxide; antioxidant enzymes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB910600, 2007CB947300, 2010CB529600]
  2. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B205]
  3. Shanghai Municipality Science & Technology Commission [05JC14090, 07DJ14005]
  4. Chinese Nutrition Society [05015]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-R-01]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30700203]
  7. NARSAD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress has been identified as a possible element in the neuropathological processes of schizophrenia (SCZ). Alteration of oxidative stress markers has been reported in SCZ studies, but with inconsistent results. To evaluate the risk of oxidative stress to schizophrenia, a meta analysis was conducted, including five markers of oxidative stress [thiobarbituric reactive substances (TBARS), nitric oxide (NO), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GP) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)] in SCZ patients versus healthy controls. This study showed that TBARS and NO significantly increased in SCZ, while SOD activity significantly decreased in the disorganized type of SCZ patients. No significant effect size was found for the activities of GP and CAT in SCZ patients (P>0.05). Egger's regression test observed no significant publication bias across the oxidative stress markers, but found high heterogeneities in all the 5 markers. The subgroup analysis suggested that the ethnicity, sample size of patients and sample sources may contribute to the heterogeneity of the results for TBARS, NO and SOD. The result further demonstrated the involvement of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available