4.6 Article

Enhanced modeling of latent heat flux from urban surfaces in the Noah/single-layer urban canopy coupled model

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 57, Issue 10, Pages 2408-2416

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-014-4829-0

Keywords

urban; surface energy balance; latent heat flux; numerical simulation; land surface model; urban canopy model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41175015]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012BAC22B00, GYHY200906026]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0939961] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The numerical modeling of the impacts of urban buildings in mesoscale meteorological models has gradually improved in recent years. Correctly representing the latent heat flux from urban surfaces is a key issue in urban land-atmosphere coupling studies but is a common weakness in current urban canopy models. Using the surface energy balance data at a height of 140 m from a 325 m meteorological tower in Beijing, we conducted a 1-year continuous off-line simulation by using a coupled land surface model and a single-layer urban canopy model and found that this model has a relatively large systematic error for simulated latent heat flux. To improve the numerical method for modeling latent heat flux from urban surfaces, we combined observational analysis and urban land surface model to derive an oasis effect coefficient for urban green areas; to develop a temporal variation formula for water availability in urban impervious surfaces; and to specify a diurnal profile and the maximum values of anthropogenic latent heat release for four seasons. These results are directly incorporated into the urban land surface model to improve model performance. In addition, this method serves as a reference for studies in other urban areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available