4.6 Article

Parameterizing soil organic carbon's impacts on soil porosity and thermal parameters for Eastern Tibet grasslands

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 1001-1011

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-012-4433-0

Keywords

soil organic carbon; soil thermal parameters; alpine grassland; parameterization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41105003, 91025004]
  2. Key Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-Q10-2]
  3. Open Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science [OFSLRSS201108]
  4. Institute of Remote Sensing Applications of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Beijing Normal University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the stratification of soil thermal properties induced by soil organic carbon (SOC) and its impacts on the parameterization of the thermal properties. Soil parameters were measured for alpine grassland stations and North China flux stations, with a total of 34 stations and 77 soil profiles. Measured data indicate that the topsoils of alpine grasslands contain high SOC contents than underlying soil layers, which leads to higher soil porosity values and lower thermal conductivity and bulk density values in the topsoils. However, this stratification is not evident at the lowland stations due to low SOC contents. Evaluations against measured data show that three thermal conductivity schemes used in land surface models severely overestimate the values for soils with high SOC content (i.e. topsoils of alpine grassland), but they are better for soils with low SOC content. A new parameterization is then developed to take the impacts of SOC into account. The new one can well estimate the soil thermal conductivity values in both low and high SOC content cases, and therefore, it is a potential candidate of thermal conductivity scheme to be used in land surface models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available