4.6 Article

Evaluation of hydrocarbon generation of the Xiamaling Formation shale in Zhangjiakou and its significance to the petroleum geology in North China

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 444-452

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-012-4538-5

Keywords

residual bitumen; pyrolysis experiment; Xiamaling Formation shale; middle Proterozoic; North China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40972093, 41172112]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [R5080124]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting [2009001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The semi-closed pyrolysis simulation system under constant pressure was conducted to explore the characteristics and mechanisms of hydrocarbon generation from Xiamaling Formation shale in Xiahuayuan, North China. The experiment results indicate the oil generated by the Xiamaling Formation shale in oil window should be classified as aromatic-intermediate type, whereas the decreasing of dry coefficient can be ascribed to the cracking of residual bitumen in source rock in the stage of high to post maturity. The amount of hydrocarbon gas generated from residual bitumen can be up to 1-2 m(3) per ton rock in high to post mature stage by calculating hydrogen contents in the kerogen, the expelled hydrocarbon, and the residual hydrocarbon. This reveals the importance of residual bitumen as a gas source during high to post mature stage of the kerogen evolution, and also as the broad exploration prospect of these gases. This research highlights the attention should be paid to oil/gas reservoirs sourced from residual bitumen of organic-rich source rock in high mature stage, even the primary oil/gas reservoirs considered as the main exploration targets in middle-upper Proterozoic sediments of North China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available